WEBVTT 1 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.210 - I'm Edie and I'm very pleased to be here 2 00:00:02.210 --> 00:00:03.795 with Jessica from BCG. 3 00:00:03.795 --> 00:00:05.338 Thanks for coming along. - Thank you. 4 00:00:05.338 --> 00:00:07.132 - And you've brought a couple of friends with you 5 00:00:07.132 --> 00:00:08.883 from the People of Crypto. - Exactly. 6 00:00:08.883 --> 00:00:10.677 - You brought Simone and Akbar. 7 00:00:10.677 --> 00:00:11.553 Welcome to you all. 8 00:00:11.553 --> 00:00:12.387 - Thank you. - Thank you. 9 00:00:12.387 --> 00:00:13.388 - Very happy to be here. 10 00:00:13.388 --> 00:00:16.975 - So we've got an interesting topic of conversation, 11 00:00:16.975 --> 00:00:21.980 and we're going to talk about gender diversity in Web 3. 12 00:00:21.980 --> 00:00:23.648 Any good news? 13 00:00:23.648 --> 00:00:26.735 - No, I'm going to ground this in horrendous facts- 14 00:00:26.735 --> 00:00:28.695 - OK. - for a starting point. 15 00:00:28.695 --> 00:00:32.407 - So we did a statistical study with these guys 16 00:00:32.407 --> 00:00:35.368 trying to focus on foundation in Web 3. 17 00:00:35.368 --> 00:00:36.536 So when we talk foundation, 18 00:00:36.536 --> 00:00:40.540 we talk of startup founders and investors, 19 00:00:40.540 --> 00:00:42.917 and we took a good look at the space. 20 00:00:42.917 --> 00:00:46.254 And when you look at all of the founders in Web 3, 21 00:00:46.254 --> 00:00:49.799 a horrendous only 7% of them are female. 22 00:00:49.799 --> 00:00:51.676 - What? - 7%. 23 00:00:51.676 --> 00:00:52.635 - Wow. 24 00:00:52.635 --> 00:00:54.471 - And there's a reason for that. 25 00:00:54.471 --> 00:00:57.015 And the reason for that is when female entrepreneurs 26 00:00:57.015 --> 00:00:59.476 actually decide to create startups, 27 00:00:59.476 --> 00:01:03.104 they are almost 78% of them 28 00:01:03.104 --> 00:01:06.232 that actually find a male to co-found with. 29 00:01:06.232 --> 00:01:09.110 If you are a male and you want to create a startup, 30 00:01:09.110 --> 00:01:12.530 then 74% of them actually choose male also. 31 00:01:12.530 --> 00:01:13.364 - Wow. 32 00:01:13.364 --> 00:01:15.992 - And so that is at the root of that huge discrepancy. 33 00:01:15.992 --> 00:01:19.037 But there's also a very rational reason for that, 34 00:01:19.037 --> 00:01:20.455 is if you look at how much money 35 00:01:20.455 --> 00:01:22.165 these companies actually raise, 36 00:01:22.999 --> 00:01:26.503 a company that is all-female founded will raise 37 00:01:26.503 --> 00:01:31.299 four X less money than an all-male-founded startup. 38 00:01:31.299 --> 00:01:33.259 Let that sink in...four X. 39 00:01:33.259 --> 00:01:35.095 It means that if you're an all-female team, 40 00:01:35.095 --> 00:01:38.056 you will likely raise about 8 million on average. 41 00:01:38.056 --> 00:01:41.684 And an all-male team will raise 30 million on average. 42 00:01:41.684 --> 00:01:42.769 That's the gap. 43 00:01:42.769 --> 00:01:45.396 And then when you look at why that is, 44 00:01:45.396 --> 00:01:48.108 you look at startups that have raised 45 00:01:48.108 --> 00:01:51.444 more than a hundred million, so a very sizable ticket, 46 00:01:51.444 --> 00:01:53.988 their share of all-female startup teams 47 00:01:53.988 --> 00:01:58.201 in that hundred million raises is less than 0%. 48 00:01:59.327 --> 00:02:00.161 - Wow. - So it's, actually, 49 00:02:00.161 --> 00:02:01.287 there is none. 50 00:02:01.287 --> 00:02:02.122 - That's incredible. 51 00:02:02.122 --> 00:02:04.457 - That is our starting point in the Web 3 space. 52 00:02:04.457 --> 00:02:06.918 - Okay, given that cheery starting point, 53 00:02:06.918 --> 00:02:08.920 Simone, why does it matter? 54 00:02:08.920 --> 00:02:12.298 - So I think, first, there is opportunity. 55 00:02:12.298 --> 00:02:15.135 So we're very, very early in the intersection 56 00:02:15.135 --> 00:02:16.386 of this technology. 57 00:02:16.386 --> 00:02:20.056 It matters because we are now moving into a phase 58 00:02:20.056 --> 00:02:22.725 where how we transact, how we monetize, 59 00:02:22.725 --> 00:02:26.980 and how we interact together has now become more important. 60 00:02:26.980 --> 00:02:29.107 People always talk about Web 3 as the evolvement 61 00:02:29.107 --> 00:02:30.150 of the internet. 62 00:02:30.150 --> 00:02:32.360 I think it's far more important than that. 63 00:02:32.360 --> 00:02:36.114 When you look at like a light bulb, we used to go on, 64 00:02:36.114 --> 00:02:38.199 a hundred years ago, but you would go on the streets 65 00:02:38.199 --> 00:02:39.993 and you would watch the street be lit up, 66 00:02:39.993 --> 00:02:42.245 or you would watch a building be lit up. 67 00:02:42.245 --> 00:02:45.290 No one understood what that light bulb would do 68 00:02:45.290 --> 00:02:46.916 for the industrial revolution. 69 00:02:46.916 --> 00:02:48.585 It basically kick-started it. 70 00:02:48.585 --> 00:02:50.879 So now we are looking at Web 3, 71 00:02:50.879 --> 00:02:53.214 moving from this industrial status 72 00:02:53.214 --> 00:02:55.091 now into a digital economy. 73 00:02:55.091 --> 00:02:58.052 And if we are not part of the development as women, 74 00:02:58.052 --> 00:03:00.722 as people of color, as diverse voices, 75 00:03:00.722 --> 00:03:03.558 it will be built in the image of those. 76 00:03:03.558 --> 00:03:05.268 And we've already seen what happens 77 00:03:05.268 --> 00:03:08.688 in Web 2, where you saw predominantly cis white males 78 00:03:08.688 --> 00:03:10.773 creating these ecosystems. 79 00:03:10.773 --> 00:03:13.610 We don't want Web 3 to now become 80 00:03:13.610 --> 00:03:15.904 a repetitive nature of Web 2. 81 00:03:15.904 --> 00:03:20.074 We have the opportunity to intersect with intentionality 82 00:03:20.074 --> 00:03:23.453 and really understanding that the foundational build 83 00:03:23.453 --> 00:03:26.748 has to be built differently for us to make change. 84 00:03:26.748 --> 00:03:28.124 And again, I do think there's, 85 00:03:28.124 --> 00:03:30.793 as bad as that was, there is opportunity. 86 00:03:30.793 --> 00:03:31.628 - Totally. 87 00:03:31.628 --> 00:03:33.004 - Well, we have a female founder right here- 88 00:03:34.464 --> 00:03:35.840 - who fund-raised successfully. 89 00:03:35.840 --> 00:03:36.883 - We did successfully raise... 90 00:03:36.883 --> 00:03:38.635 - Fantastic. - ...with her male co-founder. 91 00:03:38.635 --> 00:03:39.469 - Yeah, that's true. 92 00:03:39.469 --> 00:03:41.721 - OK. Alright. Well, congratulations. 93 00:03:41.721 --> 00:03:44.474 So Akbar, what can brands do if they care about this 94 00:03:44.474 --> 00:03:46.726 and want to get involved and want to make change? 95 00:03:46.726 --> 00:03:48.186 - Yeah, they're so paramount to this 96 00:03:48.186 --> 00:03:49.687 because brands drive culture. 97 00:03:49.687 --> 00:03:51.022 Brands drive awareness. 98 00:03:51.022 --> 00:03:53.524 If you look at groups like L'Oreal, like LVMH, 99 00:03:53.524 --> 00:03:54.859 their followers are loyal. 100 00:03:54.859 --> 00:03:57.237 They have millions of fans and followers. 101 00:03:57.237 --> 00:03:59.572 So if we can use them as a tool to educate, 102 00:03:59.572 --> 00:04:02.075 if we can let them know the importance of this technology, 103 00:04:02.075 --> 00:04:04.827 if we can let them know why we need to bring women in, 104 00:04:04.827 --> 00:04:06.329 break down barriers to entry, 105 00:04:06.329 --> 00:04:09.165 think about the mass onboarding that that could entail. 106 00:04:09.165 --> 00:04:10.959 Women are going to be the catalyst for change. 107 00:04:10.959 --> 00:04:12.502 I feel they always have been. 108 00:04:12.502 --> 00:04:15.755 And women, when women come on board, they give other voices, 109 00:04:15.755 --> 00:04:19.050 underrepresented communities, like the LGBTQIA, 110 00:04:19.050 --> 00:04:19.884 like people of color. 111 00:04:19.884 --> 00:04:21.511 So we need women at the table 112 00:04:21.511 --> 00:04:23.846 and we need brands to come in and support women 113 00:04:23.846 --> 00:04:24.931 and women-like brands. 114 00:04:24.931 --> 00:04:26.683 And we need VCs to pay up. 115 00:04:26.683 --> 00:04:27.850 And back women. 116 00:04:27.850 --> 00:04:29.727 So it all kind of works together here. 117 00:04:29.727 --> 00:04:30.895 - Here, here! 118 00:04:30.895 --> 00:04:33.940 - And that's really why we founded People of Crypto. 119 00:04:33.940 --> 00:04:36.234 We did not see ourselves represented 120 00:04:36.234 --> 00:04:37.986 in the current ecosystem. 121 00:04:37.986 --> 00:04:40.780 We believe that for us, diversity is not a word. 122 00:04:40.780 --> 00:04:42.991 It's the foundation of our company. 123 00:04:42.991 --> 00:04:45.285 If you want to be a profitable company, 124 00:04:45.285 --> 00:04:47.203 it's already shown that diverse teams 125 00:04:47.203 --> 00:04:48.830 are more profitable than others. 126 00:04:48.830 --> 00:04:51.082 So while it's the right thing to do, 127 00:04:51.082 --> 00:04:53.668 it's also the profitable thing to do. 128 00:04:53.668 --> 00:04:56.337 And when you're looking at the way that we've created it, 129 00:04:56.337 --> 00:04:57.839 we've been very intentional. 130 00:04:57.839 --> 00:05:00.675 So our team represents 98% women; 131 00:05:00.675 --> 00:05:03.136 99% are people of color. 132 00:05:03.136 --> 00:05:04.971 When we look at our cap table, 133 00:05:04.971 --> 00:05:06.723 we were very intentional to ensure 134 00:05:06.723 --> 00:05:08.057 that anyone coming on board 135 00:05:08.057 --> 00:05:10.476 would be part of our mission and vision. 136 00:05:10.476 --> 00:05:14.105 The projects that we develop are created to ensure 137 00:05:14.105 --> 00:05:15.815 that it's reflective of the world 138 00:05:15.815 --> 00:05:17.984 we want to see reflected back. 139 00:05:17.984 --> 00:05:20.737 And those are the reasons that brands, honestly, 140 00:05:20.737 --> 00:05:23.072 have a way to authentically connect, 141 00:05:23.072 --> 00:05:25.116 like what we did with L'Oreal. 142 00:05:25.116 --> 00:05:27.952 Because it's not beyond or abroad, 143 00:05:27.952 --> 00:05:30.079 it's part of who they're already speaking to. 144 00:05:30.079 --> 00:05:32.332 And when we're entering Web 3, 145 00:05:32.332 --> 00:05:35.418 to the point of, it cannot be a loophole, 146 00:05:35.418 --> 00:05:38.046 it cannot be a DNA, like, oh, well we're over here, 147 00:05:38.046 --> 00:05:39.255 we're talking about diversity. 148 00:05:39.255 --> 00:05:40.757 But then when we get to Web 3, it's, eh- 149 00:05:40.757 --> 00:05:42.133 - Not so much. 150 00:05:42.133 --> 00:05:43.343 - Not so much. 151 00:05:43.343 --> 00:05:46.512 There has to be intentionality as you move through it. 152 00:05:46.512 --> 00:05:47.347 - Fantastic. 153 00:05:47.347 --> 00:05:49.724 You know, I, my feeling about diversity's inclusion, 154 00:05:49.724 --> 00:05:52.101 we don't need to make the world any more diverse. 155 00:05:52.101 --> 00:05:53.561 It already is. 156 00:05:53.561 --> 00:05:56.064 But we do have to focus on the inclusion part. 157 00:05:56.064 --> 00:05:58.232 So we started off this conversation, 158 00:05:58.232 --> 00:05:59.525 I wasn't feeling so positive. 159 00:05:59.525 --> 00:06:02.236 I'm feeling more positive with you guys in here. 160 00:06:02.236 --> 00:06:05.323 So thank you very much for stopping by the studio here 161 00:06:05.323 --> 00:06:07.367 in Davos 2023. 162 00:06:07.367 --> 00:06:08.201 - Thank you. 163 00:06:08.201 --> 00:06:09.827 - Thank you. - Thank you.