WEBVTT 00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:01.920 - The idea that we can just continue what we're doing 00:00:01.920 --> 00:00:04.280 and adapt that, I don't think that's going to work. 00:00:04.560 --> 00:00:06.960 - Sir Nick, welcome. Great to see you. - Thank you. 00:00:06.960 --> 00:00:08.480 I'd love to get your perspective 00:00:08.480 --> 00:00:12.040 on what you think is reshaping aerospace and defense today. 00:00:12.040 --> 00:00:13.080 - Diana, thanks for inviting me. 00:00:13.080 --> 00:00:15.960 Really great to be here at Farnborough Airshow. 00:00:15.960 --> 00:00:18.800 And it's, you've just got to look around. 00:00:18.800 --> 00:00:20.720 You've got to walk around Farnborough Airshow 00:00:20.720 --> 00:00:22.560 and say, what's shaping air defense? 00:00:22.560 --> 00:00:23.560 We've got everything here 00:00:23.560 --> 00:00:27.280 from, let's call them traditional aircraft, 00:00:27.280 --> 00:00:29.040 the next-generation aircraft, like GCAP, 00:00:29.040 --> 00:00:31.440 and then you've got all kinds of really cool drones 00:00:31.440 --> 00:00:33.000 and sophisticated technology. - Yep. 00:00:33.000 --> 00:00:36.080 - So that is definitely changing the way 00:00:36.080 --> 00:00:38.760 that defense is doing its business. 00:00:38.760 --> 00:00:41.560 It's easy to sort of concentrate on the equipment, though. 00:00:41.560 --> 00:00:44.920 And the one thing that I think I would say is 00:00:44.920 --> 00:00:46.200 what's changing the nature of defense 00:00:46.200 --> 00:00:47.840 is the amount of money being spent. 00:00:47.840 --> 00:00:48.880 - OK. Yeah. - So fundamentally, there's 00:00:48.880 --> 00:00:51.360 there's a new input function. 00:00:51.360 --> 00:00:52.440 The pace that's required 00:00:52.440 --> 00:00:56.280 to then turn the money into things, that is different. 00:00:56.280 --> 00:00:57.760 And the other thing that I think, 00:00:57.760 --> 00:00:59.880 and I'm going to say I would like to change 00:00:59.880 --> 00:01:01.480 but isn't quite there yet, 00:01:01.480 --> 00:01:04.440 is the way defense is procuring, 00:01:04.440 --> 00:01:05.680 going about procurement. - OK. 00:01:05.680 --> 00:01:07.760 - We have to change the way we think about procurement, 00:01:07.760 --> 00:01:10.760 because fundamentally, the long pole in the tent currently 00:01:10.760 --> 00:01:12.560 is the commercial function. - Yeah. 00:01:12.560 --> 00:01:15.360 - I think we've got to change the way we do our business 00:01:15.360 --> 00:01:18.560 in order to get that increase of money 00:01:18.560 --> 00:01:20.960 into increased volumetric output. 00:01:20.960 --> 00:01:23.520 - And how do you think organizations need to evolve? 00:01:23.520 --> 00:01:25.040 So one is the procurement side, 00:01:25.040 --> 00:01:26.640 but how do you think organizations, 00:01:26.640 --> 00:01:28.000 especially primes like Babcock, 00:01:28.000 --> 00:01:31.960 need to evolve to succeed in this new environment? 00:01:31.960 --> 00:01:34.640 - So you'll hear all kinds of wonderful adjectives 00:01:34.640 --> 00:01:36.360 and verbs thrown around like agility 00:01:36.360 --> 00:01:38.760 and flexibility and all that, tremendous. 00:01:38.760 --> 00:01:39.560 You know what? 00:01:39.560 --> 00:01:41.880 We've just got to do what we say we're going to do. 00:01:41.880 --> 00:01:43.000 Let's start with that. 00:01:43.000 --> 00:01:44.120 Let's get a baseline that says, 00:01:44.120 --> 00:01:45.320 when you ask us to do something, 00:01:45.320 --> 00:01:47.400 we will deliver to time and cost. 00:01:47.400 --> 00:01:49.480 The second thing is then we've actually got to be 00:01:49.480 --> 00:01:51.960 more responsive to the market. 00:01:51.960 --> 00:01:53.720 We've got to take more risk. 00:01:53.720 --> 00:01:56.960 This is a risk-based calculus now. The world is different. 00:01:56.960 --> 00:02:00.240 We went from, let's say, very low risk 00:02:00.240 --> 00:02:03.920 to significantly greater risk, but we haven't adapted. 00:02:03.920 --> 00:02:06.520 We haven't changed our risk appetite 00:02:06.520 --> 00:02:09.840 commensurate with the geopolitical situation. 00:02:09.840 --> 00:02:11.880 - And do you think the introduction 00:02:11.880 --> 00:02:15.000 of what is in America now being called “neo-primes” 00:02:15.000 --> 00:02:16.920 is starting to change that risk profile, 00:02:16.920 --> 00:02:19.480 the way that primes think about risk? 00:02:19.480 --> 00:02:20.640 - I absolutely do. 00:02:20.640 --> 00:02:22.320 I mean, we've got to think about it differently 00:02:22.320 --> 00:02:26.880 because fundamentally you can't compete with, 00:02:26.880 --> 00:02:33.160 let's call it a neo-prime, that's got an enormous value 00:02:33.160 --> 00:02:37.600 and an enormous order book and no manufacturing 00:02:37.600 --> 00:02:38.920 or very little manufacturing capability 00:02:38.920 --> 00:02:40.600 to date that supports that. 00:02:40.600 --> 00:02:43.040 So that's a different conversation. 00:02:43.040 --> 00:02:45.800 And I think, I've said this before, 00:02:45.800 --> 00:02:48.880 this sort of traditional transition 00:02:48.880 --> 00:02:51.000 from VC through private equity 00:02:51.000 --> 00:02:54.480 into then long-term established businesses, 00:02:54.480 --> 00:02:55.560 there's a lot of these companies 00:02:55.560 --> 00:02:59.400 that are missing out on that private equity growth phase 00:02:59.400 --> 00:03:01.560 and are going straight from VC to neo-prime. 00:03:01.560 --> 00:03:03.480 - Yeah, understood. 00:03:03.480 --> 00:03:05.880 What do you think is going to define the winners and the losers? 00:03:05.880 --> 00:03:10.800 More on the prime side, but what will make a company 00:03:10.800 --> 00:03:12.960 ride this wave out successfully? 00:03:12.960 --> 00:03:15.040 - So I think we're going to have to be more 00:03:15.040 --> 00:03:18.880 private equity-like and less PLC-like. 00:03:18.880 --> 00:03:21.000 I recognize that the shareholder... I get all that. 00:03:21.000 --> 00:03:21.960 We're going to have to work out. 00:03:21.960 --> 00:03:23.320 The shareholders invest in companies 00:03:23.320 --> 00:03:25.400 because actually they want return. 00:03:25.400 --> 00:03:27.520 And therefore, we're going to have to work out 00:03:27.520 --> 00:03:31.160 how we generate more value in that return space, 00:03:31.160 --> 00:03:34.480 because otherwise we're going to be outdone. 00:03:34.480 --> 00:03:35.120 - Yeah. 00:03:35.120 --> 00:03:36.600 - But then we're going to have to have a long-term strategy 00:03:36.600 --> 00:03:38.040 that allows us to work back 00:03:38.040 --> 00:03:40.400 from where we want to be five years from now, 00:03:40.400 --> 00:03:42.200 and then put in place what must be true. 00:03:42.200 --> 00:03:44.160 The idea that we can just continue what we're doing 00:03:44.160 --> 00:03:47.240 and adapt that, I don't think that's going to work. 00:03:47.240 --> 00:03:51.360 And you know, three sort of areas 00:03:51.360 --> 00:03:52.640 that we need to get involved in. 00:03:52.640 --> 00:03:55.000 We need to do what we currently do better. 00:03:55.000 --> 00:03:57.040 So that's a performance issue. 00:03:57.040 --> 00:03:58.520 We need to invest in those areas 00:03:58.520 --> 00:04:02.080 where we're not currently out, and that's about new markets, 00:04:02.080 --> 00:04:04.880 but based on our credibility in the first space. 00:04:04.880 --> 00:04:08.280 And then we need to have a much more aggressive third space, 00:04:08.280 --> 00:04:11.520 which I think is that, sort of, let's call it speculative, 00:04:11.520 --> 00:04:16.360 but the areas where we're not traditionally comfortable, 00:04:16.360 --> 00:04:18.600 but we're going to have to work with partners 00:04:18.600 --> 00:04:20.800 in order to think differently about how we do it. 00:04:20.800 --> 00:04:22.440 - Sir Nick, thank you for your time today. 00:04:22.440 --> 00:04:23.880 - Thank you very much for having me, Diana.