WEBVTT 00:00:00.024 --> 00:00:01.584 There's definitely greater momentum 00:00:01.584 --> 00:00:04.546 in terms of recognizing that you have to work with nature 00:00:04.546 --> 00:00:06.589 to address the climate crisis, the water crisis, 00:00:06.589 --> 00:00:07.966 the food crisis. 00:00:07.966 --> 00:00:09.592 But just what are nature-based solutions 00:00:09.592 --> 00:00:10.802 and how do they work? 00:00:10.802 --> 00:00:12.929 - Yeah, this word has (laughs) come out of nowhere 00:00:12.929 --> 00:00:14.389 and taken the world over. 00:00:14.389 --> 00:00:15.932 I think it's worth recognizing 00:00:15.932 --> 00:00:18.018 that the NbS, or the nature-based solutions, word 00:00:18.018 --> 00:00:20.353 really came through the COP system 00:00:20.353 --> 00:00:22.230 to address mitigation issues, 00:00:22.230 --> 00:00:25.108 to deal with those solutions that we could employ 00:00:25.108 --> 00:00:27.610 that would help bring us to 1.5 00:00:27.610 --> 00:00:29.612 sucking carbon out of the environment, et cetera. 00:00:29.612 --> 00:00:31.114 But of course, there's another side to that 00:00:31.114 --> 00:00:32.240 that's a resilience side. 00:00:32.240 --> 00:00:33.950 And the nature-based solutions 00:00:33.950 --> 00:00:35.744 in restoration and protection 00:00:35.744 --> 00:00:37.871 has been something that's been in my world 00:00:37.871 --> 00:00:39.581 for many, many years, 00:00:39.581 --> 00:00:42.417 ecosystem-based adaptation or restoration. 00:00:42.417 --> 00:00:45.045 But NbS as a tool of thinking 00:00:45.045 --> 00:00:46.588 about how can you work with nature 00:00:46.588 --> 00:00:48.465 or build back with nature 00:00:48.465 --> 00:00:51.384 to absorb the impacts of a changing world. 00:00:51.384 --> 00:00:53.553 And that could be things like wetland restoration, 00:00:53.553 --> 00:00:57.265 aquifer recharge, river restoration, mangrove restoration. 00:00:57.265 --> 00:01:01.019 There's so many different tools at our disposal 00:01:01.019 --> 00:01:02.604 in building back with nature. 00:01:02.604 --> 00:01:05.231 And of course, there's an affordability to it 00:01:05.231 --> 00:01:07.984 that is cheaper than gray infrastructure. 00:01:07.984 --> 00:01:09.527 That's not to say that gray infrastructure 00:01:09.527 --> 00:01:10.570 isn't going to be needed, 00:01:10.570 --> 00:01:12.280 but I think there's also a realization 00:01:12.280 --> 00:01:14.532 of the limits of gray infrastructure, 00:01:14.532 --> 00:01:16.493 and in fact, that in many places, 00:01:16.493 --> 00:01:19.120 gray infrastructure is either failing or fading 00:01:19.120 --> 00:01:20.580 or just not able to do the job 00:01:20.580 --> 00:01:24.292 the way that an absorbing nature and ecosystem can.